View source for Multiregional origin of modern humans

{{Short description|Human evolution hypothesis}}
The '''multiregional hypothesis''', '''multiregional evolution''' ('''MRE'''), or '''polycentric hypothesis''', is a [[scientific modelling|scientific model]] that provides an alternative explanation to the more widely accepted [[recent African origin of modern humans|"Out of Africa" model]] of [[monogenism|monogenesis]] for the pattern of [[human evolution]].

Multiregional evolution holds that the [[human]] species first arose around two million years [[Before Present|ago]] and subsequent human evolution has been within a single, continuous human species. This species encompasses all [[Homo|archaic human]] forms such as ''[[Homo erectus|H. erectus]]'' and [[Neanderthal]]s as well as modern forms, and evolved worldwide to the diverse populations of [[anatomically modern humans]] (''[[Homo sapiens]]'').

The hypothesis contends that the mechanism of [[cline (population genetics)|clinal variation]] through a model of "Centre and Edge" allowed for the necessary balance between [[genetic drift]], [[gene flow]] and [[Natural selection|selection]] throughout the [[Pleistocene]], as well as overall evolution as a global species, but while retaining regional differences in certain morphological features.<ref name="dx.doi.org" /> Proponents of multiregionalism point to [[Multiregional origin of modern humans#Fossil evidence|fossil]] and [[Multiregional origin of modern humans#Genetic evidence|genomic]] data and continuity of [[archaeological culture]]s as support for their hypothesis.

The multiregional hypothesis was first proposed in 1984, and then revised in 2003. In its revised form, it is similar to the Assimilation Model, which holds that modern humans originated in Africa and today share a predominant recent African origin, but have also absorbed small, geographically variable, degrees of admixture from other regional ([[Archaic humans|archaic]]) hominin species.<ref name=CShuman />

The multiregional hypothesis is not currently the most accepted theory of modern human origin among scientists. "The African replacement model has gained the widest acceptance owing mainly to genetic data (particularly mitochondrial DNA) from existing populations. This model is consistent with the realization that modern humans cannot be classified into subspecies or races, and it recognizes that all populations of present-day humans share the same potential."<ref>https://www.britannica.com/science/human-evolution/The-emergence-of-Homo-sapiens</ref> The African replacement model is also known as the "Out of Africa" theory. See also, "The 'out of Africa' model is currently the most widely accepted model. It proposes that Homo sapiens evolved in Africa before migrating across the world."<ref>https://www.yourgenome.org/stories/evolution-of-modern-humans/#:~:text=The%20'out%20of%20Africa'%20model%20is%20currently%20the%20most%20widely,a%20long%20period%20of%20time.</ref> And: "The primary competing scientific hypothesis is currently recent African origin of modern humans, which proposes that modern humans arose as a new species in Africa around 100-200,000 years ago, moving out of Africa around 50-60,000 years ago to replace existing human species such as Homo erectus and the Neanderthals without interbreeding.<ref>Hua Liu, et al. (2006). "A Geographically Explicit Genetic Model of Worldwide Human-Settlement History". American Journal of Human Genetics 79 (2): 230–237. doi:10.1086/505436. PMID 16826514.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1559480</ref><ref>Weaver, Timothy D; Charles C. Roseman (2008). "New developments in the genetic evidence for modern human origins". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews (Wiley-Liss) 17 (1): 69–80. doi:10.1002/evan.20161. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117921411/abstract.</ref><ref>Fagundes, NJ; Ray N, Beaumont M, Neuenschwander S, Salzano FM, Bonatto SL, Excoffier L. (2007). "Statistical evaluation of alternatihttps://encyclopedia.pub/entry/33820ve models of human evolution". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (45): 17614–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708280104. PMID 17978179. PMC 2077041. Bibcode: 2007PNAS..10417614F. http://www.pnas.org/content/104/45/17614.long.</ref><ref name="Wolpoff, Milford 1997 p. 42">Wolpoff, Milford, and Caspari, Rachel (1997). Race and Human Evolution. Simon & Schuster. p. 42.</ref> This differs from the multiregional hypothesis in that the multiregional model predicts interbreeding with preexisting local human populations in any such migration."<ref name="Wolpoff, Milford 1997 p. 42"/><ref>Scholarly Community Encyclopeda.</ref>

== History ==
{{Human timeline}}{{Life timeline}}

=== Overview ===
The Multiregional hypothesis was proposed in 1984 by [[Milford H. Wolpoff]], [[Alan Thorne]] and [[Xinzhi Wu]].<ref>Wolpoff, M. H., Wu, X. Z., & Alan, G. (86). G. Thorne: 1984, "Modern Homo Sapiens Origins: A General Theory of Hominid Evolution Involving the Fossil Evidence from east Asia". The Origins of Modern Humans, Liss, New York, 411–83.</ref><ref name="multiregional">{{cite journal | last1=Wolpoff | first1=MH | last2=Hawks |first2=J |author-link2=John D. Hawks |last3=Caspari |first3=R | year=2000 | title=Multiregional, not multiple origins | journal=[[American Journal of Physical Anthropology]] | volume=112 | issue=1 | pages=129–36 | url=http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wolpoff/Papers/Multiregional.PDF |doi=10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200005)112:1<129::AID-AJPA11>3.0.CO;2-K |pmid=10766948| hdl=2027.42/34270 | hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref name="dx.doi.org">{{cite journal | last1 = Wolpoff | first1 = M. H. | last2 = Spuhler | first2 = J. N. | last3 = Smith | first3 = F. H. | last4 = Radovcic | first4 = J. | last5 = Pope | first5 = G. | last6 = Frayer | first6 = D. W. | last7 = Eckhardt | first7 = R. | last8 = Clark | first8 = G. | year = 1988 | title = Modern Human Origins | journal = Science | volume = 241 | issue = 4867| pages = 772–74 | doi =  10.1126/science.3136545 | pmid=3136545| bibcode = 1988Sci...241..772W | s2cid = 5223638 }}</ref> Wolpoff credits [[Franz Weidenreich]]'s "Polycentric" hypothesis of human origins as a major influence, but cautions that this should not be confused with [[polygenism]], or [[Carleton S. Coon|Carleton Coon]]'s model that minimized gene flow.<ref name="multiregional" /><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Hawks | first1 = J. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M. H. | year = 2003 | title = Sixty years of modern human origins in the American Anthropological Association | url =https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/65197/1/aa.2003.105.1.89.pdf | journal = American Anthropologist | volume = 105 | issue = 1| pages = 89–100 | doi=10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.89| hdl = 2027.42/65197 | hdl-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Eckhardt | first1 = R. B. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M. H. | last3 = Thorne | first3 = A. G. | year = 1993 | title = Multiregional Evolution | doi = 10.1126/science.262.5136.973-b | journal = Science | volume = 262 | issue = 5136| page = 974 }}</ref> According to Wolpoff, multiregionalism was misinterpreted by [[William W. Howells]], who confused Weidenreich's hypothesis with a polygenic "candelabra model" in his publications spanning five decades:

{{Blockquote|How did Multiregional evolution get stigmatized as polygeny? We believe it comes from the confusion of Weidenreich's ideas, and ultimately of our own, with Coon's. The historic reason for linking Coon's and Weidenreich's ideas came from the mischaracterizations of Weidenreich's Polycentric model as a candelabra (Howells, 1942, 1944, 1959, 1993), that made his Polycentric model appear much more similar to Coon's than it actually was.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Caspari | first1 = R. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M. H. | year = 1996 | title = Weidenreich, Coon, and multiregional evolution | journal = Human Evolution | volume = 11 | issue = 3–4| pages = 261–68 | doi=10.1007/bf02436629| s2cid = 84805412 }}</ref>}}

Through the influence of Howells, many other anthropologists and biologists have confused multiregionalism with polygenism i.e. separate or multiple origins for different populations. [[Alan Templeton]] for example notes that this confusion has led to the error that gene flow between different populations was added to the Multiregional hypothesis as a "special pleading in response to recent difficulties", despite the fact: "parallel evolution was ''never'' part of the multiregional model, much less its core, whereas gene flow was ''not a recent addition'', but rather was present in the model from the very beginning"<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Templeton | first1 = A. R. | year = 2007 | title = Genetics and recent human evolution | journal = Evolution | volume = 61 | issue = 7| pages = 1507–19 | doi=10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00164.x | pmid=17598736| doi-access = free }}</ref> (emphasis in original). Despite this, multiregionalism is still confused with polygenism, or Coon's model of racial origins, from which Wolpoff and his colleagues have distanced themselves.<ref>Wolpoff, M. H. and R. Caspari. 1997. ''Race and human evolution: A fatal attraction''. New York: Simon and Schuster.</ref><ref>Wolpoff, M.H., and R. Caspari. (2000). "[https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/jspui/bitstream/10593/3400/1/01wolp.pdf The Many Species of Humanity]". Przegląd Antropologiczny (Anthropological Review) 63(1): 3–17.</ref> Wolpoff has also defended Wiedenreich's Polycentric hypothesis from being labeled polyphyletic. Weidenreich himself in 1949 wrote: "I may run the risk of being misunderstood, namely that I believe in polyphyletic evolution of man".<ref>Weidenreich, F. (1949). "Interpretations of the fossil material". In: ''Early Man in the Far East: Studies in Physical Anthropology''. Howells, W. W (ed). Studies in Physical Anthropology; No. 1, American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Detroit. pp. 149–57.</ref>

In 1998, [[Xinzhi Wu|Wu]] founded a China-specific Multiregional model called "Continuity with [Incidental] Hybridization".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wu | first1 = X. | year = 1998 | title = Origin of modern humans of China viewed from cranio-dental characteristics of late Homo sapiens | journal = Acta Anthropologica Sinica | volume = 17 | pages = 276–82 }}</ref><ref>Rosenberg, K. R., Wu, X. (2013). "A River Runs through It: Modern Human Origins in East Asia". In: ''The Origins of Modern Humans: Biology Reconsidered''. Smith, F. H (ed). Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 89–122.</ref> Wu's variant only applies the Multiregional hypothesis to the East Asian fossil record, and is popular among Chinese scientists.<ref>Liu, L., Chen, X. (2012). ''The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age''. Cambridge University Press. p. 14: "the majority of Chinese archaeologists and palaeontologists support[s] the multiregional development model, proposing a hypothesis of regional continuity with hybridization between immigrants and indigenous populations in the evolution from ''H. erectus'' to ''H. sapiens'' in East Asia."</ref> However, James Leibold, a political historian of modern China, has argued the support for Wu's model is largely rooted in [[Chinese nationalism]].<ref>Leibold, J. (2012). "'Filling in the Nation: The Spatial Trajectory of Prehistoric Archaeology in Twentieth-Century China," in ''Transforming History: The Making of a Modern Academic Discipline in Twentieth Century China'', eds. Brian Moloughney and Peter Zarrow, pp. 333–71 (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press).</ref> Outside of China, the Multiregional hypothesis has limited support, held only by a small number of paleoanthropologists.<ref>Begun, DR. (2013). "The Past, Present and Future of Palaeoanthropology". In: ''A Companion to Paleoanthropology''. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 8: "It needs to be noted, however, that this [Multiregional model] is a minority view among paleoanthropologists, most of whom support the African replacement model."</ref>

=== "Classic" vs "weak" multiregionalism ===
[[Chris Stringer]], a leading proponent of the more mainstream [[Out of Africa theory|recent African origin theory]], debated Multiregionalists such as Wolpoff and Thorne in a series of publications throughout the late 1980s and 1990s.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Stringer | first1 = C. B. | last2 = Andrews | first2 = P. | year = 1988 | title = Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans | journal = Science | volume = 239 | issue = 4845| pages = 1263–68 | doi=10.1126/science.3125610 | pmid=3125610| bibcode = 1988Sci...239.1263S }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Stringer | first1 = C. | last2 = Bräuer | first2 = G. | year = 1994 | title = Methods, misreading, and bias | journal = American Anthropologist | volume = 96 | issue = 2| pages = 416–24 | doi=10.1525/aa.1994.96.2.02a00080}}</ref><ref>Stringer, C. B. (1992). "Replacement, continuity and the origin of Homo sapiens". In: ''Continuity or replacement? Controversies in Homo sapiens evolution''. F. H. Smith (ed). Rotterdam: Balkema. pp. 9–24.</ref><ref name="Bräuer, G. 1997 pp. 191-201">Bräuer, G., & Stringer, C. (1997). "Models, polarization, and perspectives on modern human origins". In: ''Conceptual issues in modern human origins research''. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. pp. 191–201.</ref> Stringer describes how he considers the original Multiregional hypothesis to have been modified over time into a weaker variant that now allows a much greater role for Africa in human evolution, including [[Anatomically modern humans|anatomical modernity]] (and subsequently less regional continuity than was first proposed).<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Stringer | first1 = C. | year = 2001 | title = Modern human origins – distinguishing the models | journal = Afr. Archaeol. Rev. | volume = 18 | issue = 2| pages = 67–75 | doi = 10.1023/A:1011079908461 | s2cid = 161991922 }}</ref>

Stringer distinguishes the original or "classic" Multiregional model as having existed from 1984 (its formulation) until 2003, to a "weak" post-2003 variant that has "shifted close to that of the Assimilation Model".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Stringer | first1 = C | year = 2002 | title = Modern human origins: progress and prospects | journal = Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London | volume = 357 | issue = 1420| pages = 563–79 | doi=10.1098/rstb.2001.1057| pmid = 12028792 | pmc = 1692961 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Stringer | first1 = C. | year = 2014 | title = Why we are not all multiregionalists now | journal = Trends in Ecology & Evolution | volume = 29 | issue = 5| pages = 248–51 | doi=10.1016/j.tree.2014.03.001| pmid = 24702983 | doi-access = free }}</ref>

===Genetic studies===
The finding that "[[Mitochondrial Eve]]" was relatively recent and African seemed to give the upper hand to the proponents of the Out of Africa hypothesis. But in 2002, [[Alan Templeton]] published a genetic analysis involving other loci in the genome as well, and this showed that some variants that are present in modern populations existed already in Asia hundreds of thousands of years ago.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Templeton, A. R. |year=2002|url=http://www.bioguider.com/ebook/biology/pdf/Templeton_n2002.pdf |title=Out of Africa again and again |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=416 |pages=45–51 |doi=10.1038/416045a |pmid=11882887|issue=6876|bibcode=2002Natur.416...45T |s2cid=4397398}}</ref> This meant that even if our male line ([[Y chromosome]]) and our female line ([[mitochondrial DNA]]) came out of Africa in the last 100,000 years or so, we have inherited other genes from populations that were already outside of Africa. Since this study other studies have been done using much more data (see [[Phylogeography]]).

== Fossil evidence ==

=== Morphological clades ===
[[File:Sangiran 17-02.JPG|thumb|upright|Replica of Sangiran 17 ''Homo erectus'' skull from Indonesia showing obtuse face to vault angle determined by fitting of bones at brow.]]
[[File:Kowswamp1 cropped.png|thumb|upright|Cast of anatomically modern human Kow Swamp 1 skull from Australia with a face to vault angle matching that of Sangiran 17 (Wolpoff's reconstruction).]]

Proponents of the multiregional hypothesis see regional continuity of certain morphological traits spanning the [[Pleistocene]] in different regions across the globe as evidence against a [[Out of Africa theory|single replacement model]] from Africa. In general, three major regions are recognized: [[Europe]], [[China]], and [[Indonesia]] (often including [[Australia]]).<ref>Wolpoff, M. H. (1985). Human evolution at the peripheries: the pattern at the eastern edge. Hominid Evolution: past, present and future, 355–65.</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite journal | last1 = Frayer | first1 = D.W. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M. H. | last3 = Thorne | first3 = A.G. | last4 = Smith | first4 = F. H. | last5 = Pope | first5 = G.G. | year = 1993 | title = Theories of modern human origins: the paleontological test | journal = American Anthropologist | volume = 95 | issue = 1| pages = 14–50 | doi=10.1525/aa.1993.95.1.02a00020}}</ref><ref>Wolpoff, M.H., A.G. Thorne, F.H. Smith, D.W. Frayer, and G.G. Pope: Multiregional Evolution: A World-Wide Source for Modern Human Populations.  In: ''Origins of Anatomically Modern Humans'', edited by M.H. Nitecki and D.V. Nitecki.  Plenum Press, New York.  pp. 175–99.</ref> Wolpoff cautions that the continuity in certain skeletal features in these regions should not be seen in a racial context, instead calling them ''morphological clades''; defined as sets of traits that "uniquely characterise a geographic region".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wolpoff | first1 = M. H. | year = 1989 | title = Multiregional evolution: the fossil alternative to Eden | journal = The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans | volume = 1 | pages = 62–108 }}</ref> According to Wolpoff and Thorne (1981): "We do not regard a morphological clade as a unique lineage, nor do we believe it necessary to imply a particular
taxonomic status for it".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Thorne | first1 = A. G. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M. H. | year = 1981 | title = Regional continuity in Australasian Pleistocene hominid evolution | journal = American Journal of Physical Anthropology | volume = 55 | issue = 3| pages = 337–49 | doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330550308 | pmid=6791505}}</ref> Critics of multiregionalism have pointed out that no single human trait is unique to a geographical region (i.e. confined to one population and not found in any other) but Wolpoff ''et al''. (2000) note that regional continuity only recognizes combinations of features, not traits if individually accessed, a point they elsewhere compare to the forensic identification of a human skeleton:

{{Blockquote|Regional continuity... is not the claim that such features do not appear elsewhere; the genetic structure of the human species makes such a possibility unlikely to the extreme. There may be uniqueness in ''combinations'' of traits, but no single trait is likely to have been unique in a particular part of the world although it might appear to be so because of the incomplete sampling provided by the spotty human fossil record.}}

Combinations of features are "unique" in the sense of being found in only one region, or more weakly limited to one region at high frequency (very rarely in another). Wolpoff stresses that regional continuity works in conjunction with genetic exchanges between populations. Long-term regional continuity in certain morphological traits is explained by [[Alan Thorne]]'s "Centre and Edge"<ref>Thorne, A.G. (1981). "The Centre and the Edge: The significance of Australian hominids to African Palaeoanthropology". Proceedings of the 8th Pan-African Congress of Prehistory (Nairobi), pp. 180–81. Nairobi: National Museums of Kenya.</ref> population genetics model which resolves Weidenreich's paradox of "how did populations retain geographical distinctions and yet evolve together?". For example, in 2001 Wolpoff and colleagues published an analysis of character traits of the skulls of early modern human fossils in Australia and central Europe.  They concluded that the diversity of these recent humans could not "result exclusively from a single late Pleistocene dispersal", and implied dual ancestry for each region, involving interbreeding with Africans.<ref name="Wolpoff 2001">{{cite journal | last=Wolpoff | first=Milford H. |author2=John Hawks |author3=David W. Frayer |author4=Keith Hunley  | year=2001 | title=Modern Human Ancestry at the Peripheries: A Test of the Replacement Theory | journal=Science | volume=291 | pages=293–97 | doi=10.1126/science.291.5502.293 | pmid=11209077 | issue=5502 |bibcode = 2001Sci...291..293W }}</ref>

==== Indonesia, Australia ====
[[Alan Thorne|Thorne]] held that there was regional continuity in [[Indonesia]] and [[Australia]] for a morphological clade.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Thorne | first1 = A.G. | year = 1984 | title = Australia's human origins – how many sources? | doi = 10.1002/ajpa.1330630203 | pmid = 6711682 | journal = American Journal of Physical Anthropology | volume = 63 | issue = 2| pages = 133–242 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Thorne | first1 = A.G. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M.H. | year = 1992 | title = The multiregional evolution of humans | journal = Scientific American | volume = 266 | issue = 4| pages = 76–83 | doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0492-76| pmid = 1566033 | bibcode = 1992SciAm.266d..76T }}</ref>  This sequence is said to consist of the earliest fossils from [[Sangiran]], Java, that can be traced through [[Ngandong]] and found in prehistoric and recent [[Aboriginal Australians]]. In 1991, Andrew Kramer tested 17 proposed morphological clade features. He found that: "a plurality (eight) of the seventeen non-metric features link Sangiran to modern Australians" and that these "are suggestive of morphological continuity, which implies the presence of a genetic continuum in Australasia dating back at least one million years"<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Kramer | first1 = A. | year = 1991 | title = Modern human origins in Australasia: replacement or evolution? | journal = American Journal of Physical Anthropology | volume = 86 | issue = 4| pages = 455–73 | doi=10.1002/ajpa.1330860403| pmid = 1776654 }}</ref> but [[Colin Groves]] has criticized Kramer's methodology, pointing out that the polarity of characters was not tested and that the study is actually inconclusive.<ref>Groves, C.P. (1997). "Thinking about Evolutionary Change The Polarity of Our Ancestors". In: ''Conceptual issues in modern human origins research''. Transaction Publishers.</ref> Dr. Phillip Habgood discovered that the characters said to be unique to the [[Australasia]]n region by Thorne are [[Cladistics#Terminology for character states|plesiomorphic]]:

{{Blockquote|...it is evident that all of the characters proposed... to be 'clade features' linking Indonesian ''Homo erectus'' material with Australian Aboriginal crania are retained primitive features present on ''Homo erectus'' and archaic ''Homo sapiens'' crania in general. Many are also commonly found on the crania and mandibles of anatomically-modern ''Homo sapiens'' from other geographical locations, being especially prevalent on the robust Mesolithic skeletal material from North Africa."<ref>Habgood, P.J. (1989) "The origin of anatomically modern humans in Australasia. In: P. Mellars and C.B. Stringer (eds.) ''The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives in the Origins of Modern Humans'', pp. 245–73.</ref>}}

Yet, regardless of these criticisms Habgood (2003) allows for limited regional continuity in Indonesia and Australia, recognizing four plesiomorphic features which do not appear in such a unique combination  on fossils in any other region: a sagittally flat frontal bone, with a posterior position of minimum frontal breadth, great facial prognathism, and zygomaxillary tuberosities.<ref>Habgood, P.J. (2003). ''A Morphometric Investigation into the Origins of Anatomically Modern Humans''. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 1176. Oxford England: Archaeopress.</ref> This combination, Habgood says, has a "certain Australianness about it".

Wolpoff, initially skeptical of Thorne's claims, became convinced when reconstructing the [[Sangiran]] 17 ''Homo erectus'' skull from Indonesia, when he was surprised that the skull's face to vault angle matched that of the Australian modern human [[Kow Swamp Archaeological Site|Kow Swamp]] 1 skull in excessive prognathism. Durband (2007) in contrast states that "features cited as showing continuity between Sangiran 17 and the Kow Swamp sample disappeared in the new, more orthognathic reconstruction of that fossil that was recently completed".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Durband | first1 = A. | year = 2007 | title = The view from down under: a test of the multiregional hypothesis of modern human origins using the basicranial evidence from Australasia | journal = Collegium Antropologicum | volume = 31 | issue = 3| pages = 651–59 | pmid = 18041369 }}</ref> Baba ''et al''. who newly restored the face of Sangiran 17 concluded: "regional continuity in Australasia is far less evident than Thorne and Wolpoff argued".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Baba | first1 = H. | last2 = Aziz | first2 = F. | last3 = Narasaki | first3 = S. | year = 2000 | title = Restoration of the face of Javanese Homo erectus Sangiran 17 and re-evaluation of regional continuity in Australasia | journal = Acta Anthropologica Sinica | volume = 19 | pages = 34–40 }}</ref>

==== China ====
[[File:Peking Man Skull (replica) presented at Paleozoological Museum of China.jpg|thumb|left|Replica of ''Homo erectus'' ("Peking man") skull from China.]]
[[Xinzhi Wu]] has argued for a morphological clade in China spanning the Pleistocene, characterized by a combination of 10 features.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wu | first1 = X. | year = 1990 | title = The evolution of humankind in China | journal = Acta Anthropologica Sinica | volume = 9 | issue = 4| pages = 312–21 }}</ref><ref>Wu, X., Poirier, F. E. (1995).[https://archive.org/stream/HumanEvolutionInChina/WuPoirier-HumanEvolutionInChina-95#page/n245/mode/2up Human evolution in China: a metric description of the fossils and a review of the sites]. New York: Oxford University Press.</ref> The sequence is said to start with [[Lantian Man|Lantian]] and [[Peking Man]], traced to [[Dali (fossil)|Dali]], to [[Late Pleistocene]] specimens (e.g. Liujiang) and recent Chinese. Habgood in 1992 criticized Wu's list, pointing out that most of the 10 features in combination appear regularly on fossils outside China.<ref>Habgood, P.J. (1992). "The origin of anatomically modern humans in east Asia". In: G. Bräuer, and F.H. Smith (eds.) ''Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens evolution''. pp. 273–88.</ref> He did though note that three combined: a non-depressed nasal root, non-projecting perpendicularly oriented nasal bones and facial flatness are unique to the Chinese region in the fossil record and may be evidence for limited regional continuity. However, according to [[Chris Stringer]], Habgood's study suffered from not including enough fossil samples from North Africa, many of which exhibit the small combination he considered to be region-specific to China.<ref name="Bräuer, G. 1997 pp. 191-201"/>

Facial flatness as a morphological clade feature has been rejected by many anthropologists since it is found on many early African ''[[Homo erectus]]'' fossils, and is therefore considered plesiomorphic,<ref>Groves, C. P. (1989). "A regional approach to the problem of the origin of modern humans in Australasia". In: P. Mellars & CB. Stringer (eds). In: ''The Human Revolution''. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 274–85.</ref> but Wu has responded that the form of facial flatness in the Chinese fossil record appears distinct to other (i.e. primitive) forms. Toetik Koesbardiati in her PhD thesis "On the Relevance of the Regional Continuity Features of the Face in East Asia" also found that a form of facial flatness is unique to China (i.e. only appears there at high frequency, very rarely elsewhere) but cautions that this is the only available evidence for regional continuity: "Only two features appear to show a tendency as suggested by the Multiregional model: flatness at the upper face expressed by an obtuse nasio-frontal angle and flatness at the middle part of the face expressed by an obtuse zygomaxillay angle".

[[Shovel-shaped incisors]] are commonly cited as evidence for regional continuity in China.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Woo | first1 = R | year = 1986 | title = Chinese human fossils and the origin of Mongoloid racial group | journal = Anthropos (Brno) | volume = 23 | pages = 151–55 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wu | first1 = X. | year = 2006 | title = Evidence of Multiregional Human Evolution Hypothesis from China | journal = Quaternary Sciences | volume = 26 | issue = 5| pages = 702–70 }}</ref> Stringer (1992) however found that shovel-shaped incisors are present on >70% of the early Holocene [[Wadi Halfa]] fossil sample from North Africa, and common elsewhere.<ref>Stringer, C. B. (1992). "Replacement, continuity and the origin of Homo sapiens". In: ''Continuity or replacement? Controversies in Homo sapiens evolution''. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema. pp. 9–24.</ref> Frayer ''et al''. (1993) have criticized Stringer's method of scoring shovel-shaped incisor teeth. They discuss the fact that there are different degrees of "shovelled" e.g. trace (+), semi (++), and marked (+++), but that Stringer misleadingly lumped all these together: "...combining shoveling categories in this manner is biologically meaningless and misleading, as the statistic cannot be validly compared with the very high frequencies for the marked shoveling category reported for East Asians."<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Palaeoanthropologist Fred H. Smith (2009) also emphasizes that: "It is the ''pattern'' of shoveling that identities as an East Asian regional feature, not just the occurrence of shoveling of any sort".<ref name=CShuman>Cartmill, M & Smith, F. H. (2009). ''The Human Lineage''. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 450.</ref> Multiregionalists argue that marked (+++) shovel-shaped incisors only appear in China at a high frequency, and have <10% occurrence elsewhere.

==== Europe ====

[[File:Sapiens neanderthal comparison.jpg|thumb|upright=1.75|Comparison of modern human (left) and Neanderthal (right) skulls.]]

Since the early 1990s, David W. Frayer has described what he regards as a morphological clade in Europe.<ref>Frayer, D. W. (1992). "The persistence of Neanderthal features in post-Neanderthal Europeans". In: ''Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution''. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 179–88.</ref><ref>Frayer, D. W. (1992)."Evolution at the European edge: Neanderthal and the Upper Paleolithic relationships. ''Préhistoire Européene''. 2:9–69.</ref><ref>Frayer, D. W. (1997)."Perspectives on Neanderthals as ancestors". In: ''Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research''. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. pp. 220–35.</ref> The sequence starts with the earliest dated [[Neanderthal]] specimens ([[Krapina]] and [[Saccopastore skulls]]) traced through the mid-[[Late Pleistocene]] (e.g. [[La Ferrassie 1]]) to [[Vindija Cave]], and late Upper Palaeolithic [[Cro-Magnon]]s or recent Europeans. Although many anthropologists consider Neanderthals and Cro Magnons morphologically distinct,<ref>{{cite journal | last=Harvati | first=Katerina |author2=Stephen R. Frost |author3=Kieran P McNulty | year=2004 | title=Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: Implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences | journal=PNAS | volume=101 | issue=5 | pages=1147–52 | doi=10.1073/pnas.0308085100 | pmid=14745010 | pmc=337021 |bibcode = 2004PNAS..101.1147H | doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="10.1002/evan.20017">{{Cite journal | last=Pearson | first=Osbjorn M. | year=2004 | title=Has the Combination of Genetic and Fossil Evidence Solved the Riddle of Modern Human Origins? | journal=Evolutionary Anthropology | volume=13 | issue=4 | pages=145–59 | doi=10.1002/evan.20017 | s2cid=31478877 }}</ref> Frayer maintains quite the opposite and points to their similarities, which he argues is evidence for regional continuity:

{{Blockquote|"Contrary to Brauer's recent pronouncement that there is a large and generally recognized morphological gap between the Neanderthals and the early moderns, the actual evidence provided by the extensive fossil record of late Pleistocene Europe shows considerable continuity between Neanderthals and subsequent Europeans."<ref name="ReferenceA"/>}}

Frayer ''et al''. (1993) consider there to be at least four features in combination that are unique to the European fossil record: a horizontal-oval shaped [[mandibular foramen]], anterior mastoid tubercle, [[suprainiac fossa]] and narrowing of the nasal breadth associated with tooth-size reduction. Regarding the latter, Frayer observes a sequence of nasal narrowing in Neanderthals, following through to late Upper Palaeolithic and Holocene (Mesolithic) crania. His claims are disputed by others,<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Holton | first1 = N. E. | last2 = Franciscus | first2 = R. G. | year = 2008 | title = The paradox of a wide nasal aperture in cold-adapted Neandertals: a causal assessment | journal = Journal of Human Evolution | volume = 55 | issue = 6| pages = 942–51 | doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.001 | pmid=18842288}}</ref> but have received support from Wolpoff, who regards late Neanderthal specimens to be "transitional" in nasal form between earlier Neanderthals and later Cro Magnons.<ref>Wolpoff, M. H. (1989). "The place of Neanderthals in human evolution". In: ''The Emergence of Modern Humans: Biocultural Adaptations in the Later Pleistocene''. Trinkaus, E (ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 97–41.</ref> Based on other cranial similarities, Wolpoff ''et al''. (2004) argue for a sizable Neanderthal contribution to modern Europeans.<ref name="10.1080/0043824042000303700">{{Cite journal | doi=10.1080/0043824042000303700 | title=Why not the Neandertals? | year=2004 | author=Wolpoff, Milford |author2=Bruce Mannheim |author3=Alan Mann |author4=John Hawks |author5=Rachel Caspari |author6=Karen R. Rosenberg |author7=David W. Frayer |author8=George W. Gill |author9=Geoffrey Clark | journal=World Archaeology | volume=36 | issue=4 | pages=527–46 | s2cid=2507757 }}</ref>

More recent claims regarding continuity in skeletal morphology in Europe focus on fossils with both Neanderthal and modern anatomical traits, to provide evidence of interbreeding rather than replacement.<ref name="doi=10.1073/pnas.0702214104">{{Cite journal
| doi=10.1073/pnas.0702214104
|date=May 2007
| author=Trinkaus, E.
| title=European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals
| volume=104
| issue=18
| pages=7367–72
| issn=0027-8424
| pmid=17452632
| pmc=1863481
| journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
| bibcode=2007PNAS..104.7367T
|doi-access=free
}}</ref><ref>[https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070423185434.htm The Emerging Fate Of The Neandertals]</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Smith | first1 = F. H. | last2 = Janković | first2 = I. | last3 = Karavanić | first3 = I. | year = 2005 | title = The assimilation model, modern human origins in Europe, and the extinction of Neandertals | journal = Quaternary International | volume = 137 | issue = 1| pages = 7–19 | doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2004.11.016| bibcode = 2005QuInt.137....7S }}</ref> Examples include the ''[[Lapedo child]]'' found in Portugal<ref name=Duarte1999>{{cite journal | title = The early Upper Paleolithic human skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and modern human emergence in Iberia |author=Duarte C. |author2=Maurício J. |author3=Pettitt P. |author4=Souto P. |author5-link=Erik Trinkaus |author5=Trinkaus E. |author6=van der Plicht H. |author7=Zilhão J. | year = 1999 | journal = Proc Natl Acad Sci USA | volume = 96 | issue = 13 | pages = 7604–09 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7604 | pmid = 10377462 | pmc = 22133|bibcode = 1999PNAS...96.7604D |doi-access=free }}</ref> and the ''Oase 1'' mandible from [[Peștera cu Oase]], Romania,<ref name="10.1073/pnas.2035108100">{{Cite journal | doi=10.1073/pnas.2035108100 |date=September 2003 |author1=Trinkaus, E. |author2=Moldovan, O. |author3=Milota, S. |author4=Bîlgăr, A. |author5=Sarcina, L. |author6=Athreya, S. |author7=Bailey, S.E. |author8=Rodrigo, R. |author9=Mircea, G. |author10=Higham, T. |author11=Ramsey, C.B. |author12=van der Plicht, J. | title=An early modern human from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania | journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume=100 | issue=20 | pages=11231–36 | issn=0027-8424 | pmid=14504393 | pmc=208740 | quote=When multiple measurements are undertaken, the mean result can be determined through averaging the activity ratios. For Oase 1, this provides a weighted average activity ratio of 〈14a〉 = 1.29 ± 0.15%, resulting in a combined OxA-GrA 14C age of 34,950, +990, and −890 B.P. | bibcode=2003PNAS..10011231T|doi-access=free }}</ref> though the ''Lapedo child'' is disputed by some.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7117 | title = Hominids and hybrids: The place of Neanderthals in human evolution |author1=Tattersall, Ian |author2=Schwartz, Jeffrey H.  |name-list-style=amp | year = 1999 | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume = 96 | issue = 13 | pages = 7117–19 | pmid = 10377375 | pmc = 33580|bibcode = 1999PNAS...96.7117T | doi-access = free }}</ref>

== Genetic evidence ==
[[File:MacaulayRichardsmtDNAtree.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|Human mitochondrial DNA tree. "Mitochondrial Eve" is near the top of the diagram, next to the jagged arrow pointing to "Outgroup", and her distance from any nonafrican groups indicates that living human mitochondrial lineages coalesce in Africa.]]

=== Mitochondrial Eve ===
A 1987 analysis of mitochondrial DNA from 147 people by Cann ''et al''. from around the world indicated that their mitochondrial lineages all coalesced in a [[mitochondrial Eve|common ancestor]] from Africa between 140,000 and 290,000 years ago.<ref name="10.1038/325031a0">{{cite journal |author=Cann, Rebecca L. |author2=Stoneking, Mark |author3=Wilson, Allan C. | title=Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution | journal=Nature | volume=325 | issue=6099 | pages=31–36 | date=1987-01-01 | doi=10.1038/325031a0 | url=http://artsci.wustl.edu/~landc/html/cann/ | pmid=3025745 | bibcode=1987Natur.325...31C |s2cid=4285418 | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100813121953/http://artsci.wustl.edu/~landc/html/cann/ | archive-date=2010-08-13 }}</ref>   The analysis suggested that this reflected the worldwide expansion of modern humans as a new species, replacing, rather than mixing with, local archaic humans outside of Africa. Such a recent replacement scenario is not compatible with the Multiregional hypothesis and the mtDNA results led to increased popularity for the alternative [[Out of Africa theory|single replacement theory]].<ref name="HavilandPrins2009">{{cite book |vauthors=McBride B, Haviland WE, Prins HE, Walrath D | title = The Essence of Anthropology | publisher = Wadsworth Publishing | location = Belmont, CA | year = 2009 | page = 90 | isbn = 978-0-495-59981-4 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=AmvJ1XtnIQoC&pg=PA90 }}</ref><ref name="HetheringtonReid2010">{{cite book |vauthors=Reid GR, Hetherington R | title = The climate connection: climate change and modern human evolution | publisher = Cambridge University Press | location = Cambridge, UK | year = 2010 | isbn = 978-0-521-14723-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AAja8FTPF6QC&pg=PA64 | page = 64 }}</ref><ref name="Meredith2011">{{cite book | author = Meredith M | title = Born in Africa: The Quest for the Origins of Human Life | publisher = PublicAffairs | location = New York | year = 2011 | isbn = 978-1-58648-663-1 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=WrR9OShae2wC&pg=PT148 }}</ref> According to Wolpoff and colleagues:

{{Blockquote|"When they were first published, the Mitochondrial Eve results were clearly incongruous with Multiregional evolution, and we wondered how the two could be reconciled."<ref>Wolpoff, M., Caspari, R. (1997). ''Race and human evolution: A fatal attraction''. New York: Simon and Schuster. p. 213.</ref>}}

Multiregionalists have responded to what they see as flaws in the Eve theory,<ref>Wolpoff, M.; Thorne, A. (1991) "The case against Eve" ''New Scientist'' 130(1774): 37–41</ref> and have offered contrary genetic evidences.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Curnoe | first1 = D. | last2 = Thorne | first2 = A. | year = 2003 | title = Number of ancestral human species: a molecular perspective | journal = HOMO: Journal of Comparative Human Biology | volume = 53 | issue = 3| pages = 201–24 | doi=10.1078/0018-442x-00051| pmid = 12733395 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wu | first1 = X. | year = 2004 | title = Discussion on the results of some molecular studies concerning the origin of modern Chinese | journal = Acta Anthropologica Sinica | volume = 24 | issue = 4| pages = 259–69 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Thorne | first1 = A.G. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M. H. | last3 = Eckhardt | first3 = R.B. | year = 1993 | title = Genetic variation in Africa | journal = Science | volume = 261 | issue = 5128| pages = 1507–1508 | doi=10.1126/science.8372344| pmid = 8372344 | bibcode = 1993Sci...261.1507T }}</ref> Wu and Thorne have questioned the reliability of the [[molecular clock]] used to date Eve.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wu | first1 = Xinzhi | last2 = Gao | first2 = Xing | last3 = Zhang | first3 = X. | last4 = Yang | first4 = D. | last5 = Shen | first5 = C. | year = 2010 | title = Revisiting the origin of modern humans in China and its implications for global human evolution | journal = Science China Earth Sciences | volume = 53 | issue = 12| pages = 1927–40 | doi = 10.1007/s11430-010-4099-4 | bibcode = 2010ScChD..53.1927G | s2cid = 195307737 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Thorne | first1 = A.G. | last2 = Curnoe | first2 = D. | year = 2006 | title = What is the real age of Adam and Eve? Proceedings of the Australian Society of Human Biology | journal = HOMO: Journal of Comparative Human Biology | volume = 57 | page = 240 }}</ref> Multiregionalists point out that Mitochondrial DNA alone can not rule out interbreeding between early modern and archaic humans, since archaic human mitochondrial strains from such interbreeding could have been lost due to [[genetic drift]] or a [[selective sweep]].<ref name="10.1038/hdy.2008.14">{{cite journal | doi=10.1038/hdy.2008.14 | last=Relethford | first=J.H. | date=2008-03-05 | title=Genetic evidence and the modern human origins debate | journal=Heredity | volume=100 | issue=6 | pages=555–63 | pmid=18322457 | doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="johnhawks.weaver_roseman_2005">{{cite web | url=http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/weaver_roseman_2005.html | title=Selection, nuclear genetic variation, and mtDNA | work=john hawks weblog | date=5 September 2005 | access-date=2011-01-05 }}</ref> Wolpoff for example states that Eve is "not the most recent common ancestor of all living people" since "Mitochondrial history is not population history".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Thorne | first1 = A.G. | last2 = Wolpoff | first2 = M.H. | year = 2003 | title = The Multiregional Evolution of Humans | journal = Scientific American | volume = 13 | issue = 2| pages = 46–53 }}</ref>

=== Neanderthal mtDNA ===
Neanderthal [[mitochondrial DNA]] ([[mtDNA]]) sequences from [[Neanderthal 1|Feldhofer]] and [[Vindija Cave]] are substantially different from modern human mtDNA.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Krings M, Stone A, Schmitz RW, Krainitzki H, Stoneking M, Pääbo S |title=Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans |journal=Cell |volume=90 |issue=1 |pages=19–30 |date=July 1997 |pmid=9230299 |doi=10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80310-4|hdl=11858/00-001M-0000-0025-0960-8 |s2cid=13581775 |hdl-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Krings | first1 = M. | last2 = Capelli | first2 = C. | last3 = Tschentscher | first3 = F. | last4 = Geisert | first4 = H. | last5 = Meyer | first5 = S. | last6 = von Haeseler | first6 = A.| year = 2000 | title = A view of Neandertal genetic diversity | journal = Nature Genetics | volume = 26 | issue = 2| pages = 144–46 | doi=10.1038/79855| pmid = 11017066 | s2cid = 10426584 |display-authors=etal}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wang | first1 = C.C. | last2 = Farina | first2 = S.E. | last3 = Li | first3 = H. | year = 2013 | title = Neanderthal DNA and modern human origins | journal = Quaternary International | volume = 295 | pages = 126–29 | doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2012.02.027| bibcode = 2013QuInt.295..126W }}</ref> Multiregionalists however have discussed the fact that the average difference between the Feldhofer sequence and living humans is less than that found between chimpanzee subspecies,<ref name="10.1002/ajpa.1060"/><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Wolpoff | first1 = M. | year = 1998 | title = Concocting a Divisive Theory | journal = Evolutionary Anthropology | volume = 7 | issue = 1| pages = 1–3 | doi=10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1998)7:1<1::aid-evan1>3.3.co;2-w| doi-access = free | hdl = 2027.42/38589 | hdl-access = free }}</ref> and therefore that while Neanderthals were different [[subspecies]], they were still human and part of the same lineage.

=== Nuclear DNA ===
Initial analysis of [[Y chromosome]] DNA, which like mitochondrial DNA, is inherited from only one parent, was consistent with a recent African replacement model.  However, the mitochondrial and Y chromosome data could not be explained by the same modern human expansion out of Africa; the Y chromosome expansion would have involved genetic mixing that retained regionally local mitochondrial lines.  In addition, the Y chromosome data indicated a later expansion back into Africa from Asia, demonstrating that gene flow between regions was not unidirectional.<ref name="Hammer1998">{{cite journal | author = Hammer, M.F. |display-authors=etal | title = Out of Africa and Back Again: Nested Cladistic Analysis of Human Y Chromosome Variation | journal = Molecular Biology and Evolution | volume = 15 | issue = 4 | pages = 427–41 | year = 1998 | url=http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/4/427.short | pmid = 9549093 | doi=10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025939| doi-access = free }}</ref>

An early analysis of 15 noncoding sites on the [[X chromosome]] found additional inconsistencies with the recent African replacement hypothesis.  The analysis found a multimodal distribution of [[Coalescence (genetics)|coalescence times]] to the most recent common ancestor for those sites, contrary to the predictions for recent African replacement; in particular, there were more coalescence times near 2 million years ago ([[mya (unit)|mya]]) than expected, suggesting an ancient population split around the time [[Homo|humans]] first emerged from Africa as ''Homo erectus'', rather than more recently as suggested by the mitochondrial data.  While most of these X chromosome sites showed greater diversity in Africa, consistent with African origins, a few of the sites showed greater diversity in Asia rather than Africa.  For four of the 15 gene sites that did show greater diversity in Africa, the sites' varying diversity by region could not be explained by simple expansion from Africa, as would be required by the recent African replacement hypothesis.<ref name="10.1534/genetics.103.025361">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1534/genetics.103.025361 |author1=Hammer, M.F. |author2=Garrigan, D. |author3=Wood, E. |author4=Wilder, J.A. |author5=Mobasher, Z. |author6=Bigham, A. |author7=Krenz, J.G. |author8=Nachman, M.W. | title = Heterogeneous patterns of variation among multiple human x-linked Loci: the possible role of diversity-reducing selection in non-africans | journal = Genetics | volume = 167 | issue = 4 | pages = 1841–53 |date=August 2004 | issn = 0016-6731 | pmid = 15342522 | pmc = 1470985 | url = http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/4/1841?ijkey=cb14a3724516d1a584feb8454d2c49cd72e003ee&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha | format = Free full text }}  Additional discussion of these results is available in a video of a presentation given by Hammer at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff0jwWaPlnU (video) from about 40 to 50 minutes into the video.</ref>

Later analyses of X chromosome and [[autosome|autosomal]] DNA continued to find sites with deep coalescence times inconsistent with a single origin of modern humans,<ref name="10.1534/genetics.105.046995">The CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase [[CMAH]] pseudogene shows 2.9 Mya coalescence time.  {{Cite journal | doi = 10.1534/genetics.105.046995 |author1=Hayakawa, T |author2=Aki, I |author3=Varki, A |author4=Satta, Y |author5=Takahata, N | title = Fixation of the Human-Specific CMP-N-Acetylneuraminic Acid Hydroxylase Pseudogene and Implications of Haplotype Diversity for Human Evolution | journal = Genetics | volume = 172 | issue = 2 | pages = 1139–46 |date=February 2006 | issn = 0016-6731 | pmid = 16272417 | pmc = 1456212 }}</ref><ref name="10.1073/pnas.96.6.2582">The PDHA1 ([[pyruvate dehydrogenase]]) locus on the X chromosome has an estimated coalescence time of 1.86 Mya, inconsistent with a recent species origin, although the worldwide lineage pattern is unlike other autosomal sites and may be consistent with recent dispersal from Africa.  {{Cite journal | author = Rosalind M. Harding | title = More on the X files | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | volume = 96 | issue = 6 | pages = 2582–84 | date = March 16, 1999 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2582| pmid = 10077551 | pmc = 33533 |bibcode = 1999PNAS...96.2582H | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="doi = 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3320">A second group finds the same ancient origin for PDHA1, but finds no evidence of a recent expansion, consistent with other autosomal and X chromosome sites and contrary to mitochondrial data.  {{Cite journal | doi = 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3320 |author1=Harris, E. E. |author2=Jody Hey | title = X chromosome evidence for ancient human histories | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | volume = 96 | issue =6 | pages = 3320–24 | year = 1999 | pmid=10077682 | pmc=15940 | bibcode=1999PNAS...96.3320H|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="10.1534/genetics.107.083691">The [[ASAH1]] gene has two recently differentiated lineages with a [[Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor|coalescence time]] 2.4±.4 Mya not explainable by [[balancing selection]].  The V lineage shows evidence of recent positive selection.  The lineage pattern may be the result of hybridization during a recent range expansion from Africa with the V lineage tracing to archaic humans from outside Africa, though it is also consistent with a mixture of two long isolated groups within Africa; it is not consistent with a recent origination of a modern human species that replaced archaic forms without interbreeding.  {{Cite journal | doi = 10.1534/genetics.107.083691 |author1=Kim, Hl |author2=Satta, Y | title = Population Genetic Analysis of the N-Acylsphingosine Amidohydrolase Gene Associated With Mental Activity in Humans | journal = Genetics | volume = 178 | issue = 3 | pages = 1505–15 |date=March 2008 | issn = 0016-6731 | pmid = 18245333 | pmc = 2278054 | url = http://www.genetics.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18245333 | quote = It is speculated that, when modern humans dispersed from Africa, admixture of the distinct V and M lineages occurred and the V lineage has since spread in the entire population by possible positive selection.}}</ref><ref name="10.1534/genetics.105.041095">{{Cite journal | doi=10.1534/genetics.105.041095 |author1=Daniel Garrigan |author2=Zahra Mobasher |author3=Sarah B. Kingan |author4=Jason A. Wilder |author5=Michael F. Hammer | title=Deep Haplotype Divergence and Long-Range Linkage Disequilibrium at Xp21.1 Provide Evidence That Humans Descend From a Structured Ancestral Population | journal=Genetics | volume = 170 | pmc=1449746 | issue = 4 | pages=1849–56 |date=August 2005 | url=http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/abstract/170/4/1849 | pmid=15937130}}</ref> diversity patterns inconsistent with a recent expansion from Africa,<ref name="10.1186/1471-2156-9-21">[[NAT2]] [[SNPs]] lineages cluster in sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, and East Asia, with genetic distances scaling with geographic distances.  {{Cite journal | doi = 10.1186/1471-2156-9-21 |author1=Sabbagh, A. |author2=Langaney, A. |author3=Darlu, P. |author4=Gérard, N. |author5=Krishnamoorthy, R. |author6=Poloni, E. S. | title = Worldwide distribution of NAT2 diversity: Implications for NAT2 evolutionary history | journal = BMC Genetics |date=February 2008 | volume = 9| pages = 21 | pmid = 18304320 | pmc = 2292740 |doi-access=free }}  Also see [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/9/21/figure/F3 map]; may resize browser window.</ref> or both.<ref name="10.1086/500614">The NAT1 lineage tree is rooted in Eurasia with a coalescence time of 2.0 Mya that cannot be explained by balancing selection and with the NAT1*11A haplotype absent from subsaharan Africa.  {{Cite journal | doi = 10.1086/500614 |date=March 2006 | author = Patin, E. |author2=Barreiro, L.B. |author3=Sabeti, P.C. |author4=Austerlitz, F. |author5=Luca, F. |author6=Sajantila, A. |author7=Behar, D.M. |author8=Semino, O. |author9=Sakuntabhai, A. |author10=Guiso, N. |author11=Gicquel, B. |author12=Mcelreavey, K. |author13=Harding, R.M. |author14=Heyer, E. |author15=Quintana-Murci, L. |display-authors=3  |name-list-style=amp | title = Deciphering the Ancient and Complex Evolutionary History of Human Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase Genes | journal = American Journal of Human Genetics | volume = 78 | issue = 3 | pages = 423–36| issn = 0002-9297 | pmid = 16416399 | pmc = 1380286}}</ref><ref name="johnhawks.nat1_nat2_patin_2006_selection">{{cite web | url=http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genetics/diet/nat1_nat2_patin_2006_selection.html | title=Variation in NAT1 and NAT2 | work=john hawks weblog | date=15 January 2006 | access-date=2011-01-04 }}</ref>  For example, analyses of a region of RRM2P4 ([[ribonucleotide reductase]] M2 subunit [[pseudogene]] 4) showed a coalescence time of about 2 Mya, with a clear root in Asia,<ref name="10.1093/molbev/msi013">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1093/molbev/msi013 |author1=Garrigan, D. |author2=Mobasher, Z. |author3=Severson, T. |author4=Wilder, J. A. |author5=Hammer, M.F. | title = Evidence for archaic Asian ancestry on the human X chromosome | journal = Molecular Biology and Evolution | volume = 22 | issue = 2 | pages = 189–92 |date=February 2005 | issn = 0737-4038 | pmid = 15483323 | url = http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15483323 | format = Free full text | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="10.1534/genetics.107.080432">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1534/genetics.107.080432 |author1=Cox, M.P. |author2=Mendez, F.L. |author3=Karafet, T.M. |author4=Pilkington, M.M. |author5=Kingan, S.B. |author6=Destro-Bisol, G. |author7=Strassmann, B.I. |author8=Hammer, M.F. | title = Testing for Archaic Hominin Admixture on the X Chromosome: Model Likelihoods for the Modern Human RRM2P4 Region From Summaries of Genealogical Topology Under the Structured Coalescent | journal = Genetics | volume = 178 | issue = 1 | pages = 427–37 |date=January 2008 | issn = 0016-6731 | pmid = 18202385 | pmc = 2206091 | url = http://www.genetics.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18202385 | format = Free full text }}</ref> while the [[MAPT]] locus at [[chromosome 17|17]]q21.31 is split into two deep genetic lineages, one of which is common in and largely confined to the present European population, suggesting inheritance from Neanderthals.<ref name="Hardy2005.BiochemicalSocietyTransactions33.4.582-585">{{Cite journal | title=Evidence suggesting that Homo neanderthalensis contributed the H2 MAPT haplotype to Homo sapiens |author1=J. Hardy |author2=A. Pittman |author3=A. Myers |author4=K. Gwinn-Hardy |author5=H. C. Fung |author6=R. de Silva |author7=M. Hutton |author8=J. Duckworth | journal=Biochemical Society Transactions | year=2005 | volume=33 |issue=4 | doi = 10.1042/bst0330582
| pages=582–85 | pmid=16042549}}</ref><ref name="10.1038/ng.193">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1038/ng.193 | author = Zody, M. C. |author2=Jiang, Z. |author3=Fung, H. C. |author4=Antonacci, F. |author5=Hillier, L. W. |author6=Cardone, M. F. |author7=Graves, T. A. |author8=Kidd, J. M. |author9=Cheng, Z. |author10=Abouelleil, A. |author11=Chen, L. |author12=Wallis, J. |author13=Glasscock, J. |author14=Wilson, R. K. |author15=Reily, A. D. |author16=Duckworth, J. |author17=Ventura, M. |author18=Hardy, J. |author19=Warren, W. C. |author20=Eichler, E. E.  |name-list-style=amp |display-authors=3 | title = Evolutionary Toggling of the MAPT 17q21.31 Inversion Region | journal = Nature Genetics | volume =40 | pmc = 2684794 | pages =1076–83 |date=August 2008 | issn = 1061-4036 | pmid = 19165922 | issue=9}}</ref><ref name="10.1038/hdy.2008.70">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1038/hdy.2008.70 |author1=Almos, P. Z. |author2=Horváth, S. |author3=Czibula, A. |author4=Raskó, I. |author5=Sipos, B. |author6=Bihari, P. |author7=Béres, J. |author8=Juhász, A. |author9=Janka, Z. |author10=Kálmán, J. | title = H1 tau haplotype-related genomic variation at 17q21.3 as an Asian heritage of the European Gypsy population | journal = Heredity | volume = 101 | issue = 5 | pages = 416–19 |date=November 2008 | issn = 0018-067X | pmid = 18648385 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="10.1038/ng1508">{{Cite journal | doi=10.1038/ng1508 |author1=Stefansson H. |author2=Helgason A. |author3=Thorleifsson G. |author4=Steinthorsdottir V. |author5=Masson G. |author6=Barnard J. |author7=Baker A. |author8=Jonasdottir A. |author9=Ingason A. |author10=Gudnadottir V. G. |display-authors=3 | title=A common inversion under selection in Europeans | journal=Nature Genetics | volume=37 | issue=2 | pages=129–37 | date=2005-01-16 | url=http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/abstract/170/4/1849 | pmid=15654335|s2cid=120515 }}</ref>  In the case of the [[Microcephalin]] D allele, evidence for rapid recent expansion indicated [[introgression]] from an archaic population.<ref name="10.1073/pnas.0606966103">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0606966103 |author1=Evans, P. D. |author2=Mekel-Bobrov, N. |author3=Vallender, E. J. |author4=Hudson, R. R. |author5=Lahn, B. T. | title = Evidence that the adaptive allele of the brain size gene microcephalin introgressed into Homo sapiens from an archaic Homo lineage | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume = 103 | issue = 48 | pages = 18178–83 |date=November 2006 | issn = 0027-8424 | pmid = 17090677 | pmc = 1635020 | bibcode=2006PNAS..10318178E|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="10.1073/pnas.0702214104">{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1073/pnas.0702214104 | author = Trinkaus, E. | title = European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume = 104 | issue = 18 | pages = 7367–72 |date=May 2007 | issn = 0027-8424 | pmid = 17452632 | pmc = 1863481 | bibcode=2007PNAS..104.7367T| doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="10.1126/science.1113722">{{Cite journal | doi=10.1126/science.1113722 |author1=Evans, P. D. |author2=Gilbert, S. L. |author3=Mekel-Bobrov, N. |author4=Vallender, E. J. |author5=Anderson, J. R. |author6=Vaez-Azizi, L. M. |author7=Tishkoff, S. A. |author8=Hudson, R. R. |author9=Lahn, B. T. | title=Microcephalin, a gene regulating brain size, continues to evolve adaptively in humans | journal=Science | volume=309 | issue=5741 | pages=1717–20 |date=September 2005 | issn=0036-8075 | pmid=16151009 | bibcode=2005Sci...309.1717E|s2cid=85864492 }}</ref><ref name="introgression_faq_2006">{{cite web | url=http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/introgression_faq_2006.html | title=Introgression and microcephalin FAQ | work=john hawks weblog | date=8 November 2006 | access-date=2011-01-05 }}</ref> However, later analysis, including of the genomes of Neanderthals, did not find the Microcephalin D allele (in the proposed archaic species), nor evidence that it had introgressed from an archaic lineage as previously suggested.<ref name = "Human genome tales">
{{cite journal | vauthors = Pennisi E | author-link=Elizabeth Pennisi | title = Neandertal genomics. Tales of a prehistoric human genome | journal = Science | volume = 323 | issue = 5916 | pages = 866–71 | date = February 2009 | pmid = 19213888 | doi = 10.1126/science.323.5916.866 | s2cid = 206584252 }}
</ref><ref name = "green">
{{cite journal | vauthors = Green RE, Krause J, Briggs AW, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Kircher M, Patterson N, Li H, Zhai W, Fritz MH, Hansen NF, Durand EY, Malaspinas AS, Jensen JD, Marques-Bonet T, Alkan C, Prüfer K, Meyer M, Burbano HA, Good JM, Schultz R, Aximu-Petri A, Butthof A, Höber B, Höffner B, Siegemund M, Weihmann A, Nusbaum C, Lander ES, Russ C, Novod N, Affourtit J, Egholm M, Verna C, Rudan P, Brajkovic D, Kucan Ž, Gušic I, Doronichev VB, Golovanova LV, Lalueza-Fox C, de la Rasilla M, Fortea J, Rosas A, Schmitz RW, Johnson PL, Eichler EE, Falush D, Birney E, Mullikin JC, Slatkin M, Nielsen R, Kelso J, Lachmann M, Reich D, Pääbo S | display-authors = 6 | title = A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome | journal = Science | volume = 328 | issue = 5979 | pages = 710–722 | date = May 2010 | pmid = 20448178 | doi = 10.1126/science.1188021 | bibcode = 2010Sci...328..710G | pmc=5100745}}
</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lari M, Rizzi E, Milani L, Corti G, Balsamo C, Vai S, Catalano G, Pilli E, Longo L, Condemi S, Giunti P, Hänni C, De Bellis G, Orlando L, Barbujani G, Caramelli D | title = The microcephalin ancestral allele in a Neanderthal individual | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 5 | issue = 5 | pages = e10648 | date = May 2010 | pmid = 20498832 | pmc = 2871044 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0010648 | bibcode = 2010PLoSO...510648L | doi-access = free }}</ref>

In 2001, a [[DNA]] study of more than 12,000 men from 163 East Asian regions showed that all of them carry a mutation that originated in Africa about 35,000 to 89,000 years ago and these "data do not support even a minimal ''[[in situ]]'' hominid contribution in the origin of anatomically modern humans in East Asia".<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Ke | first1 = Yuehai | display-authors = etal   | year = 2001 | title = African Origin of Modern Humans in East Asia: A Tale of 12,000 Y Chromosomes | journal = Science | volume = 292 | issue = 5519| pages = 1151–53 | doi = 10.1126/science.1060011 | pmid=11349147| bibcode = 2001Sci...292.1151K| s2cid = 32685801 }}</ref>

In a 2005 review and analysis of the genetic lineages of 25 chromosomal regions, [[Alan Templeton]] found evidence of more than 34 occurrences of gene flow between Africa and Eurasia.  Of these occurrences, 19 were associated with continuous restricted gene exchange through at least 1.46 million years ago; only 5 were associated with a recent expansion from Africa to Eurasia.  Three were associated with the original expansion of ''Homo erectus'' out of Africa around 2 million years ago, 7 with an intermediate expansion out of Africa at a date consistent with the expansion of [[Acheulean]] tool technology, and a few others with other gene flows such as an expansion out of Eurasia and back into Africa subsequent to the most recent expansion out of Africa.  Templeton rejected a hypothesis of complete recent African replacement with greater than 99% certainty ([[P-value|p]]&nbsp;<&nbsp;10<sup>−17</sup>).<ref name="10.1002/ajpa.20351">{{cite journal | doi=10.1002/ajpa.20351 | author=Templeton, Alan R. | title=Haplotype Trees and Modern Human Origins | journal=Yearbook of Physical Anthropology | volume=48 | issue=S41 | pages=33–59 | year=2005 | url=http://esa.ipb.pt/pdf/28.pdf | pmid=16369961}}</ref>

=== Ancient DNA ===
{{main|Archaic human admixture with modern humans}}
Recent analyses of DNA taken directly from Neanderthal specimens indicates that they or their ancestors contributed to the genome of all humans outside of Africa, indicating there was some degree of interbreeding with Neanderthals before their replacement.<ref>
{{cite journal
|url=http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/7/1957.full
|title=An X-Linked Haplotype of Neandertal Origin Is Present Among All Non-African Populations
|journal=[[Molecular Biology and Evolution]]
|volume=28
|issue=7
|pages=1957–62
|doi=10.1093/molbev/msr024
|first1=Vania
|last1=Yotova
|first2=Jean-Francois
|last2=Lefebvre
|first3=Claudia
|last3=Moreau
|first4=Elias
|last4=Gbeha
|first5=Kristine
|last5=Hovhannesyan
|first6=Stephane
|last6=Bourgeois
|first7=Sandra
|last7=Bédarida
|first8=Luisa
|last8=Azevedo
|first9=Antonio
|last9=Amorim
|display-authors=2
|pmid=21266489
|date=Jul 2011
|doi-access=free
}}</ref> It has also been shown that Denisova hominins contributed to the DNA of Melanesians and Australians through interbreeding.<ref>{{cite journal|title = Denisova Admixture and the First Modern Human Dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania|year = 2011|doi = 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.09.005|url = http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/reich/Reich_Lab/Welcome_files/2011_AJHG_Stoneking_Denisova_Impact.pdf|last = Reich|display-authors = etal|journal = The American Journal of Human Genetics|issue = 4|volume = 89|pmid = 21944045|pmc = 3188841|pages = 516–528|access-date = 2013-09-07|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141009084935/http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/reich/Reich_Lab/Welcome_files/2011_AJHG_Stoneking_Denisova_Impact.pdf|archive-date = 2014-10-09|url-status = dead}}</ref>

By 2006, extraction of DNA directly from some archaic human samples was becoming possible.  The earliest analyses were of Neanderthal DNA, and indicated that the Neanderthal contribution to modern human genetic diversity was no more than 20%, with a most likely value of 0%.<ref name="10.1126/science.1131412">{{cite journal | author=Noonan, James P. |display-authors=etal | title= Sequencing and Analysis of Neanderthal Genomic DNA | journal=Science | volume=314 | issue=5802 | pages=1113–18 | date=2006-11-17 | doi=10.1126/science.1131412 | pmc=2583069 | pmid=17110569 |bibcode = 2006Sci...314.1113N }}</ref>  By 2010, however, detailed DNA sequencing of the Neanderthal specimens from Europe indicated that the contribution was nonzero, with Neanderthals sharing 1-4% more genetic variants with living non-Africans than with living humans in sub-Saharan Africa.<ref name="10.1126/science.1188021">{{cite journal | author=Green, Richard E. |display-authors=etal | title= A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome | journal=Science | volume=328 | issue=5979 | pages=710–22 | date=2010-05-07 | doi=10.1126/science.1188021 | pmid=20448178|bibcode = 2010Sci...328..710G | pmc=5100745}}</ref><ref name="johnhawks.neandertals-live-genome-sequencing-2010">{{cite web | url=http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/neandertals-live-genome-sequencing-2010.html | title=Neandertals Live! | work=john hawks weblog | date=6 May 2010 | access-date=2010-12-31 }}</ref>  In late 2010, a recently discovered non-Neanderthal archaic human, the [[Denisova hominin]] from south-western Siberia, was found to share 4–6% more of its genome with living Melanesian humans than with any other living group, supporting admixture between two regions outside of Africa.<ref name="10.1038/nature09710">{{cite journal | author=Reich, David| title=Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia | journal=Nature | volume=468 | issue=7327 | pages=1053–60 | date=2010-12-23 | pmid=21179161 | doi=10.1038/nature09710 |bibcode = 2010Natur.468.1053R |display-authors=etal | pmc=4306417}}</ref><ref name="johnhawks.denisova-nuclear-genome-reich-2010">{{cite web | url=http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/denisova-nuclear-genome-reich-2010.html | title=The Denisova genome FAQ | work=john hawks weblog | date=22 December 2010 | access-date=2010-12-31 }}</ref>  In August 2011, [[Human leukocyte antigen|human leukocyte antigen (HLA)]] alleles from the archaic Denisovan and Neanderthal genomes were found to show patterns in the modern human population demonstrating origins from these non-African populations; the ancestry from these archaic alleles at the HLA-A site was more than 50% for modern Europeans, 70% for Asians, and 95% for Papua New Guineans.<ref name="10.1126/science.1209202">{{cite journal |author1=Laurent Abi-Rached |display-authors=etal | title= The Shaping of Modern Human Immune Systems by Multiregional Admixture with Archaic Humans | journal=Science | volume=334 | issue=6052 | pages= 89–94| date=2011-08-25 | doi=10.1126/science.1209202 |pmc=3677943| pmid=21868630
|bibcode =   2011Sci...334...89A}}</ref> Proponents of the multiregional hypothesis believe the combination of regional continuity inside and outside of Africa and lateral gene transfer between various regions around the world supports the multiregional hypothesis. However, "Out of Africa" Theory proponents also explain this with the fact that genetic changes occur on a regional basis rather than a continental basis, and populations close to each other are likely to share certain specific regional SNPs while sharing most other genes in common.<ref name="Witherspoon et al 2007">* {{Cite journal | last1 = Witherspoon | first1 = D. J. | last2 = Wooding | first2 = S. | last3 = Rogers | first3 = A. R. | last4 = Marchani | first4 = E. E. | last5 = Watkins | first5 = W. S. | last6 = Batzer | first6 = M. A. | last7 = Jorde | first7 = L. B. | doi = 10.1534/genetics.106.067355 | title = Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations | journal = Genetics | volume = 176 | issue = 1 | pages = 351–59 | year = 2007 | pmid = 17339205| pmc =1893020 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Witherspoon DJ, Wooding S, Rogers AR, etal |title=Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations |journal=Genetics |volume=176 |issue=1 |pages=351–59 |date=May 2007 |pmid=17339205 |pmc=1893020 |doi=10.1534/genetics.106.067355}}</ref>
Migration Matrix theory (A=Mt) indicates that  dependent upon the potential contribution of Neanderthal ancestry, we would be able to calculate the percentage of Neanderthal mtDNA contribution to the human species.  As we do not know the specific migration matrix, we are unable to input the exact data, which would answer these questions irrefutably.<ref name="10.1002/ajpa.1060">{{cite journal | author=Relethford. John. H. | title= Absence of Regional Affinities of Neandertal DNA with Living Humans Does Not Reject Multiregional Evolution | journal= American Journal of Physical Anthropology | volume=115 | issue=1 | pages=95–98 | date=2001-04-12 | doi=10.1002/ajpa.1060| pmid= 11309754 }}</ref>

== See also ==
{{Div col|small=yes}} 
* [[Archaic human admixture with modern humans]]
* [[Human evolution]]
* [[Human origins (disambiguation)|Human origins]]
* [[Mitochondrial Eve]]
* [[Phyletic gradualism]]
* [[Recent African origin of modern humans]]
* [[Y-chromosomal Adam]]
{{div col end}}

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

== Further reading ==
* [https://www.academia.edu/189705/Biogeography_of_Middle_Pleistocene_hominins_in_mainland_Southeast_Asia_A_review_of_current_evidence ''Biogeography of Middle Pleistocene hominins in mainland Southeast Asia: A review of current evidence''], Academia.edu, 23 July 2008. retrieved on 4, April 2014

== External links ==
* From [https://web.archive.org/web/20051218071948/http://www.corante.com/loom/img/Templeton%20tree%20600.jpg www.conrante.com]:  Templeton's lattice diagram showing major gene flows graphically.
* From [http://darwin.eeb.uconn.edu/eeb348/lecture-notes/mutation-drift/mutation-drift.html darwin.eeb.uconn.edu]:  notes on drift and migration with equations for calculating the effects on allele frequencies of different populations.
* ''Human Evolution''. (2011). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/275670/human-evolution
* [http://www.rafonda.com/plural_lineages.html Plural Lineages in the Human mtDNA Genome]
* [http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-evolution-timeline-interactive Human Timeline (Interactive)] – [[Smithsonian Institution|Smithsonian]], [[National Museum of Natural History]] (August 2016).

{{Early human migrations}}
{{Human Evolution}}
{{Human genetics}}
{{Portal bar|Evolutionary biology}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Multiregional Origin Of Modern Humans}}
[[Category:1984 introductions]]
[[Category:Biological hypotheses]]
[[Category:Human evolution]]
[[Category:Race (human categorization)]]
[[Category:Anatomically modern humans]]

[[es:Poligenismo]]
[[id:Asal-usul multiregional manusia modern]]