Race and intelligence
Discussions of race and intelligence – specifically, claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines – have appeared in both popular science and academic research since the scientific study of race was first introduced. With the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups were observed, and these differences have largely remained stable over time. Additionally, modern science has shown race to a biological reality 1, and intelligence is well defined as the general factor underlying a battery of cognitive tests. Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does explain at least part of the differences in IQ test performance between groups 2.
The history of race and intelligence goes back to the early 20th century. The first tests showing differences in IQ scores between different population groups in the United States were the tests of United States Army recruits in World War I. In the 1920s, groups of eugenics lobbyists argued that these results demonstrated that African Americans and certain immigrant groups were of inferior intellect to Anglo-Saxon white people, and that this was due to innate biological differences. In turn, they used such beliefs to justify policies of racial segregation. No environmental factors which are exogenous to genetics have been found to significantly impact racial IQ. Phenomena such as the Flynn effect impact the races equally within the US. In recent decades, as understanding of human genetics has advanced, claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have been broadly verified by scientists on both theoretical and empirical grounds.
References
<a id="ref1">1. Kirkegaard, Emil. "Genetic ancestry and social race are nearly interchangeable." OpenPsych, 2021. doi:10.26775/OP.2021.12.22.</a> [Back to citation](#ref1a) <a id="ref2"></a>2. Rindermann, Heiner. "Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts' background, controversial issues, and the media." Intelligence, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406. [Back to citation](#ref2a)